Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties certainly partner character attribute similarity, relationships onset, relationships high quality, and you may love. [ Backlinks ]
Baxter, L. An excellent., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of its similarities and you may differences: An excellent dialectical perspective. Record out of Private and you can Societal Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you may emotion. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid Ukrainska brudar com, Elizabeth., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Actual appeal and you may relationships alternatives: An examination of matching hypothesis. Record off Fresh Personal Psychology, seven, 173-189. [ Website links ]
Log off Social and private Relationships, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The new psychology from interpersonal matchmaking. Top Seat Lake, NJ: Pearson Knowledge (Prentice Hallway). [ Website links ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Activity overall performance and you will attributional telecommunications given that determinants of interpersonal interest. Speech Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and you can close relationships. When you look at the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The fresh new manual away from societal mindset (Vol. 2, next ed. Pp. 193-281). New york: McGraw-Hill. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, May 11). You.S. Patent six,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Late. 18). U.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Relationship diversity having personality dispositions: Testing with three different data sources. Choices Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Backlinks ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude away from positive and negative reinforcements just like the a determinant of appeal. Log from Identification and you can Personal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), Having modern-big date Cupids, analysis changes relationship: Mental research was trailing new profitable suits produced at the eHarmony. Organization for Psychological Research Observer, 18. Installed from [ Website links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. Grams. (2009). Boosting spouse selection through the internet: An evaluation regarding dating high quality anywhere between marriage ceremonies arising from an internet relationships program and marriages as a result of unfettered solutions. Interpersona: A major international Journal into Personal Matchmaking, step three, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Accumulated snow, C. (2004, May). Providing singles enter most useful marriages playing with predictive varieties of marital victory. Report shown during the 16th Annual Conference of one’s Western Emotional Neighborhood. [ Backlinks ]
Method and you may system to own identifying those who are planning to has actually a flourishing relationship
C). Why does identity number during the ination out of trait nervousness, negativity, and you can marital fulfillment. Diary out of Character and you will Public Psychology, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]
Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Implications regarding matchmaking types of getting knowledge being compatible. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict dating (pp. 119-140). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in dating ambition and you can pleasure with computers-put up partners. Log regarding ily, 28, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, A., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance on the net: Expertise on the web appeal. Diary from Sex Training and you will Therapy, twenty-two, 7-14. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Perform some one understand what they need: A comparable or subservient spouse? Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]
Feingold, An effective. (1988). Matching to own elegance during the romantic couples and you may same-sex relatives: A great meta-studies and you can theoretic critique. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Website links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from popular with terrible: Disenchantment with an intimate companion. Sociological Views, forty two, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]